Although its message is causing many to stop eating fish, detractors contend that the Netflix sensation Seaspiracy doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. Is it worthwhile to see the documentary, and is it accurate?
A documentary series hasn’t taken off quite like Netflix’s Seaspiracy since Tiger King debuted in 2020. This 90-minute video exposing the commercial fishing business, directed by Ali Tabrizi. He previously directed Cowspiracy, has piqued the interest of audiences all around the world. Seaspiracy feels like a jumping-off point for fresh talks about how we handle the beauties of ocean life, with many viewers resolving to “stop eating fish” after watching the environmental destruction and damage to marine life caused by human behavior.
Tabrizi doesn’t hold back in the documentary, which has elicited a lot of feedback from the people included in it. As well as organizations like the Marine Stewardship Council and even marine ecologists. Regardless of your feelings on Seaspiracy, the film succeeds in eliciting a visceral reaction and putting a light on how seafood ends up on our plates. What will be intriguing to observe is if Tabrizi’s extreme and single-minded approach can transform a whole sector. Rather than merely turn a few people off eating fish. Here’s why Netflix’s Seaspiracy is causing such a stir…
The Shocking Film Exposes Bycatch, ‘safe Dolphin Tuna, and Bottom Trawling.
The film’s most popular talking points have been some of the disclosures concerning the practices utilized in our seas. The marketing efforts used to make us all feel better about our fish dinners. The film claims that the ‘dolphin safe’ label we all look for on tuna isn’t accurate, provides some startling statistics on the number of whales, sea turtles, and dolphins killed as bycatch. When the fishing industry kills creatures not targeted for fishing and emphasizes the environmental damage caused by bottom trawling.
The fishing industry will contest the figures and claims, but the video is a bold conversation starter about what we want the future of our seas to be. One-eyed approach to the filmmaker chastised the issue, but his fearlessness and enthusiasm for marine life cannot be questioned. Even his harshest detractors cannot deny that some aspects of the fishing business employ alarming tactics and practices.
Every year, millions of people will watch David Attenborough‘s breathtaking documentary films to learn about the marvels of the world. Yet, detractors of the films sometimes criticize the filmmakers for not doing enough to compel us to take action. Their neglect to emphasize the daily environmental damage caused by humanity is all that one says. Is Ali Tabrizi going too far in the opposite direction? Perhaps. Viewers may nevertheless appreciate his efforts and arguments if they approach Seaspiracy with a skeptical eye.
Is Seaspiracy a True Story? Verifying the Facts
Sustainable fishing, a fiction has been met with a flood of criticism from all sides. Several fact-checking pieces have scrutinized his claims as claimed by Tabrizi. “Fish populations may recover and replenish if they are maintained appropriately,” according to the Marine Stewardship Council, citing examples such as Patagonian toothfish and Namibian hake.
Meanwhile, a marine scientist and fisheries researcher Dr. Bryce Stewart has taken to Twitter to accuse the film of “misleading” viewers. “It frequently exaggerates and draws connections where none exist,” she wrote. The argument is sure to continue, but Tabrizi won’t be dissatisfied — he has to deal with darker events in the movie than Twitter fact-checks.
What Is the Film, Seaspiracy All About?
Fishing nets make up 46 percent of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch plastic, which is mostly accurate. Seaspiracy has created quite a stir. The Netflix documentary, which debuted in March, follows a personal inquiry into the grave threat that overfishing poses to the world’s seas. Some organizations and professionals have chastised it for its “gotcha” journalism, antiquated data, and inability to mention Inuit rights on its official Instagram account. Ali Tabrizi, a 27-year-old environmentalist from Kent who directs the film, is featured extensively in his quest to learn more about the role of commercial fishing in the global fish extinction crisis.
What was his conclusion? Tabrizi supports the elimination of fishing subsidies, the establishment of no-catch zones to safeguard a third of the world’s seas by 2030, and the adoption of a plant-based diet by more people. There are as many questions as there are answers in this film. What would a sustainable fishing strategy entail? So what would happen if there was a drastic reduction in fishing? What would happen to the communities who rely on it for employment? And why didn’t they call it “Conspirasea,” as Twitter demanded?
When watching the movie, keep in mind that the debate is far from black and white in reality. However, in the case of Seaspiracy, it feels like we’re witnessing the other side of the argument for the first time, and the impact on many viewers will be long-lasting.
Seaspiracy is now accessible on Netflix.